Skip to main content

MQTT vs ZeroMQ

Introduction​

MQTT​

  • MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) is a lightweight, publish-subscribe network protocol that transports messages between devices.
  • Use Case: Primarily used in low-bandwidth, high-latency environments like IoT (Internet of Things).

ZeroMQ​

  • ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library, aimed at use in distributed or concurrent applications.
  • Use Case: Suitable for building complex communication systems with minimal fuss and strong performance characteristics.

Comparison​

  1. Protocol Type

    • MQTT: A messaging protocol with a broker-based architecture.
    • ZeroMQ: More of a messaging library that acts like a concurrency framework.

  2. Architecture

    • MQTT: Requires a central broker for message handling.
    • ZeroMQ: Decentralized, broker-less design, allowing direct peer-to-peer communication.

  3. Performance

    • MQTT: Optimized for low-bandwidth and unreliable networks. Not as fast as ZeroMQ but more reliable over unstable connections.
    • ZeroMQ: High-speed, low-latency. Better performance but assumes a more reliable network.

  4. Scalability

    • MQTT: Scales well, but the central broker can become a bottleneck in extremely large systems.
    • ZeroMQ: Highly scalable due to its decentralized nature, with no single point of failure.

  5. Ease of Use

    • MQTT: Simple to understand and implement, especially in IoT scenarios.
    • ZeroMQ: Requires a deeper understanding of messaging patterns and architectures.

  6. Reliability and Quality of Service (QoS)

    • MQTT: Offers three levels of QoS for message delivery.
    • ZeroMQ: Relies on the underlying transport protocol for reliability, doesn’t natively support QoS levels.

  7. Community and Support

    • MQTT: Broad adoption in IoT with extensive community support and resources.
    • ZeroMQ: Strong community, mainly in systems engineering and enterprise applications.

Use Cases​

  • MQTT: Best for IoT applications, remote monitoring, and when working with unreliable networks.
  • ZeroMQ: Ideal for high-throughput, low-latency systems, and when complex messaging patterns and architectures are required.
Building webhooks?
Svix is the enterprise ready webhooks sending service. With Svix, you can build a secure, reliable, and scalable webhook platform in minutes. Looking to send webhooks? Give it a try!

Conclusion​

  • Choose MQTT for simplicity, IoT applications, and when broker-based architecture is not an issue.
  • Opt for ZeroMQ for performance, scalability, and when a decentralized system is preferred.